Another View of Cantilevered Buildings

Another View of Cantilevered Buildings

by José R. Rivera, PE, FPE, LEED AP
Associate Principal/Director of Plumbing & Fire Protection

Lilker Associates Consulting Engineers

One Central Park

Cantilevered buildings seem to be everywhere in New York City these days, as developers and architects strive to maximize space, views and natural light in residential development. With a seemingly insatiable demand for housing stock in a city that has limited availability and height restrictions in many areas, cantilevers have become a go-to solution and a design element in their own right. The Central Park Tower, New York City’s tallest residential building completed in 2019 and home to Nordstrom’s flagship Manhattan department store, famously incorporated the concept at the 13th floor to enhance views of the park.

Bold cantilevered designs are not without challenges though. In addition to basic structural challenges, fire protection and life safety considerations need to be addressed from the perspective of the cantilevered building as well as from the adjacent building. Both properties are at risk from a fire initiated in either, which can spread via conduction in solid materials, convection through circulating fluids such as air, or thermal radiation. To maximize life safety and fire protection, New York City mandates stringent standards when considering a cantilevered construction option.

The 2014 New York City Building Code Section BC 705.12 requires a formal, peer-reviewed fire engineering analysis acceptable to the Commissioner of Buildings, where a portion of a new building is cantilevered over an adjacent building or a tax lot by a horizontal distance greater than one foot. A separate approval from the Fire Department is also required regarding access to the buildings and roofs in accordance with the New York City Fire Code. The New York City Department of Buildings (DOB) filing procedure was thoroughly clarified in their technical document, Buildings Bulletin 2017-014 dated October 25, 2017.

Fire Engineering Analysis

Detailed plans indicating where the cantilevered portions begin in relation with neighboring properties as well as fire separation distances will be submitted to the DOB. The fire separation distance will be measured perpendicularly from the face of the exterior wall to any neighboring building or tax lot line, whichever is closer. The fire separation distance will be measured individually from all exterior walls cantilevered over a tax lot line. Building code requirements for exterior openings (i.e., windows and doors) and opening protectives near lot lines must also be addressed.

Written descriptions of the existing buildings below the cantilevered portion as well as the proposed cantilever building, including detailed information regarding passive and active fire protection systems, are also required. Passive fire protection systems do not require any external power but rely instead on specific construction features and the use of materials, products, and building elements that meet well-defined fire performance requirements, such as fire-proofing around structural steel. Devices in active fire protection systems require manual, mechanical or electrical power. For example, a sprinkler system requires sprinklers to open and a water supply at a sufficient flow rate and pressure after activation to be delivered
through the system. A smoke control system relies on roof vents that open or a mechanical system to operate when a fire is detected; a detection and alarm system requires electric power to operate.

A fire engineering analysis will demonstrate that the cantilevered portions and surrounding building elements will withstand the anticipated effects of a “design fire”. A simulation or a model of the anticipated effects of the fire (convection, conduction and radiation) utilizing generally accepted fire engineering principles would be included in the analysis.

Using Construction to Counter the Effects of a Nearby Fire

Design Fire Simulation

Finite element modeling and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) computer models may be used to simulate the design fire. The design fire is programmed to occur on a 92°F summer day and last a minimum of 30 minutes. The scenario would involve a total “burn-out” of the fuel source where all active fire suppression systems fail to operate in the existing building below the cantilever and the fire department does not respond. The model will assume optimal fire conditions in which the air is flowing freely through broken windows in the existing building facing or located directly below the cantilever. The analysis will include the quantity of combustible materials per unit floor area (fuel load density) and the rate in which the fire releases energy (heat release rate, HRR, per unit area) of the existing building. The fuel load density and heat release rate per unit area are based on guidance documents published from the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and/or another internationally recognized fire protection engineering organization.

The model should account for the type of materials used for the façade of the cantilevered building and window assembly, such as type of glass, and the exterior wall coverings of the façade. The exterior walls, the glazing assemblies, structural elements, and horizontal assemblies will undergo intense failure analysis. The severity of this design fire will vary whether or not the existing building below has a combustible or noncombustible roof. In the case of a combustible roof, the fuel source is the existing building in its entirety. In the case of a noncombustible roof, the fuel source would be limited to the combustible structures and equipment located on the roof including cooling towers, photovoltaic systems, etc., or the contents of the floor level below the main roof, whichever is the greater hazard. A minimum safety factor of 20% would be applied to any scenario.

Existing Building with Combustible Roof Fire Scenario

Existing Adjacent Building with Noncombustible Roof Fire Scenarios

The submission documents will include a rooftop plan depicting current conditions of the existing building’s roof to verify the placement of the design fire scenario. The analysis will include detailed plans of the adjacent existing building, elevation drawings, building sections, soffit details of cantilevered portions, and a site plan of the proposed building as well as the adjacent building below. All rooftop features such as equipment, bulkheads, openings and other elements will be indicated and all relevant information provided, including heights of such features. Where the controlling fire is not a rooftop fire, the analysis will provide plans adequate to verify the location of the design fire scenario.

100 Norfolk Street


A summary of the results from a nationally recognized and validated CFD fire modeling program or an equivalent calculation methodology indicates if the structure, projecting assemblies, exterior façade and openings are able to withstand the anticipated effects of the design fire.

The completed analysis as well as the passive and active fire protection systems in the proposed and affected existing buildings will be peer reviewed prior to submission to the DOB. The peer review will be performed by an independent, qualified, registered fire protection engineer to determine compliance with basic engineering principles, the New York City Building Code, and all other applicable laws and rules. In addition, the fire engineering analysis will include a statement from the design professional indicating that the structure passes the design fire simulation, and is in accordance with the New York City Building Code.

There is more than meets the eye when it comes to cantilever design. It takes a talented team of architects as well as structural and fire protection engineers to make it happen.